How do I add to my thesis on medieval torture? | Yahoo …
There seems to be some doubt whether the summaries can be consideredcertainly by Eusebius, rather than 'helps for the reader' added at a laterperiod. Chapter titles in medieval manuscripts of the classicsare not generally considered authorial. However there is some evidence ofauthorial summaries for some works of Eusebius:-
I just need one sentence that is a thesis and has torture in ..
Firstly, as far as I can tell the chapter divisions themselves arelater,and the titles placed there were extracted from the summaries at the front ofeach book (this can be seen from book 1, where the numbering in the summaries atthe front does not correspond to the divisions in the text). As such, the assignment of wording to a given chapter is thework of a late-antique or medieval scribe. This leaves us with the summaries at thestart of the book. However, the wording in the summary, if the summary follows the order of thecontents, would seem to refer to this section of the body of the textanyway.
[The subject of chapter divisions and chapter titles in ancient texts is one I am trying to obtaindefinite information on. However, these cannot be chapter divisions, since chapterdivisions seem to come in at the end of antiquity - older literary texts had book divisions, but notchapter divisions. Word divisions were uncommon, as were paragraphing and punctuation! Rather the material at the front is a summary of contents, and alate-antique or medieval copyist has divided the text and used portions of the summary aschapter headings. If we look at the summary for book 1, it does not seemto line up with the chapter divisions. - the 6th item in the list is NOTthe chapter heading for chapter 6, which has none; and lines 9 and 10 are notthe titles for chapters 9 (=line 8) and 10 (=line 11). From this we cansee that the summary and the chapter divisions were not made at the sametime. I add this summary from an article on the subject: