Terrorism.Swedish University essays about THESIS ON TERRORISM.

The extremist terrorist group, al Qaeda, attacked the U.S and briefly paralyzed a nation.

Thesis statements on terrorism | Kimsmedicalcollege

To this end, Khatchadourian says that even forms of terrorism that are designed to bring about a moral good are wrong because of the methods used to achieve that good.

Nevertheless terrorism definition is universally hard to define (Brown, 2008).

Carl thesis statements on terrorism ..

Looking back in our History, (hind site is 20/20)-- we have been had many times because the SYSTEM did not allow a full and open review of a potential situation. The results were compromising and caused the US great harm. Are we willing to take such chances again in the future and allow a few narrow-minded special interest groups prevent us from taking a stand against people who do us harm just because CIVIL RIGHTS will be violated! TERRORISTS and INVADERS DO NOT HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS in the United States of America.

We must realize that terrorist and their plans of attack are not as clear cut as a made to television movie or a multi-million dollar Hollywood production.
It takes time to cultivate the info, research the possible senerios, decuss the probables with intelligent people who have experience in such matters. We cannot expect info to pop up out of the ground or be presented in a box with pretty paper. It is a process of effort, sweat, tears and yes, life-threatening.
The expense of data-mining may be high to most, but I would rather have my tax money spent in this manner than wasted on assisting people who are disrespectful of th US and are holding this nation hostage for welfare. We have too much fraud,waste and abuse from individuals who invade this country.. I think we should consentrate on preventing the abuse and horror that has and will again beset this Nation.


Thesis statement on international terrorism

For the record I also set a high price on civil liberty, but given that we mostly seem to agree that the authorities need to have some sort of investigative power, I find it absolutely bizarre that use of data mining should be seen as *more* intrusive than the alternatives, rather than much, much less intrusive. We are not talking about new surveillance programs, we are talking about making better use of data they already have, and probably even cutting back on some surveillance programs which prove not to be a good trade off. And we are not talking about squandering government money on pie in the sky schemes, we are talking about methods which inherently assess their own value and discard the useless parts, or at least allow citizens or their representatives to make better informed choices. And we aren't talking about something radical or new, we are talking about refinements of techniques which have been used in government for decades now, and by now are used by hundreds of government departments and thousands of businesses -- mostly for non-law enforcement purposes, but including dozens of law enforcement programs.

Free terrorism Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe

I don't think even that is true. Data mining does look good. In fact the real problem is that it looks to be so effective, it is a frightening to some.

Free terrorism papers, essays, and research papers

> 2) Bruce talks alot about better tradeoffs -- well and good. However, a comparison is only valid to compare two things. It makes no sense to evaluate only data-minings effectivness -- we have to have something to which we can compare it to. Either we need a baseline number we're willing to use (e.g. cost per death prevented = $1000) or we need an alternative proposal to which we can compare cost.

These results are sorted by most relevant first (ranked search)

Is there a way to test this theory? Not really. To determine the absolute success level of data mining in detecting terrorists or terrorist plots, you would first need to detect 100% of the terrorists by other means so you could compare results. This is obviously not a feasible experiment. However, you can certainly determine, or rather estimate, *relative* effectiveness by comparing successes from data mining programs to those from other resources. However, doing so rather undermines Bruce's arguments because in comparison to the alternatives data mining based programs have been more successful than most alternatives, not less, and the ones that have supposedly offered results somewhere in the same ballpark of effectiveness are far *more* dubious ethically, not less.